Last Updated on August 2, 2021 by Admin
Which of the following Cisco ACI logical constructs is equivalent to a private IP name space or IP network?
Of the available choices, a context is a Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) fabric logical construct that is equivalent to a single Internet Protocol (IP) network or IP name space. In this way, a context can be considered equivalent to a single virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) instance. An endpoint policy typically ensures that all endpoints within a given context exhibit similar behavior.
Tenants are containers that can be used to represent physical tenants, organizations, domains, or specific groupings of information. A tenant in a Cisco ACI fabric can therefore contain multiple contexts. Typically, tenants are configured to ensure that different policy types are isolated from each other, similar to user groups or roles in a role-based access control (RBAC) environment.
Common is the name for a special tenant in a Cisco ACI fabric. The common tenant typically contains policies that can be shared with other tenants. Contexts that are placed in the common tenant can likewise be shared among tenants. Contexts that are placed within a private tenant, on the other hand, are not shared with other tenants.
Endpoint groups (EPGs) are logical groupings of endpoints that provide the same application or components of an application. For example, a collection of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS) servers could be logically grouped into an EPG labeled WEB. EPGs are typically collected within application profiles. EPGs can communicate with other EPGs by using contracts.